Av rating:
Total votes: 101
Total comments: 33


Patrick Index
A Cynic's Top Ten Tips for IT Contractors
24 August 2007

1. Setting your rate

This is all obvious stuff but you may be new to contracting.

You need to build into your rate the cost of the following: - bank holidays, annual holidays, sick days (which you won’t be paid for when you might actually be sick), your pension contributions, insurance policies (e.g. medical insurance or professional indemnity insurance), time taken between contracts looking for work and your own personal development and training (you need to budget and send yourself on at least 2 training courses per annum to keep up to date with current technologies and practices).


...it is highly unlikely that you will be doing fee earning work
for more than 40 weeks in any one year.

A good benchmark is to presume that it is highly unlikely that you will be doing fee earning work for more than 40 weeks in any one year.

You can also stipulate to the agent that your payment rate is two tier depending on the sector of the final employer. In other words you would expect a higher rate for a city based job (include oil companies and pharmaceutical companies and any other businesses making excessive profits in your top tier – for example supermarkets).

2. The interview

Be suspicious of a client who does not give you a reasonably vigorous technical test of some sort. These are very easy for the client to set up and the lack of them indicates a business with an IT department probably filled with chancers (after all they probably didn’t have to take any tests) who are best avoided. Some technical tests are unfortunately designed to try and “catch you out” which again defeats the purpose of the test and indicates an IT manager lacking in intelligence who would not be worth working with.

3. Negotiating rates with your agency

When your agency asks what daily rate you are looking for always add £25-50 per day on top of your desired rate. This is because your agent will inevitably try and knock down your rate by asking you tedious questions like “is this your lowest rate..?” or “would you consider xxx amount?” and so on.

One thing you can do is ask the agent what their rate is. In other words you can counter with questions like; What is the agent’s percentage commission? Is the agency’s percentage negotiable? Would they consider a lower commission?

Quite often when you have done a good interview and the potential client is obviously interested in hiring you, the agency will attempt to drive your rate down (or more likely drive their commission up) by coming up with a story along the lines of “the client needs to decide between you and ‘another candidate’ who is prepared to take the job for xxx rate so if you don’t accept the job on the lower rate then ‘the other candidate’ will get the job”. This is the time to be strong and tell the agent that you don’t want the job at the reduced rate. If you can tough it out you may find that surprise, surprise the agent will call you back a few minutes later to say that the client has agreed your original rate and there is no further mention of this ‘other candidate’!

4. Agent payment terms

Never agree to work with an agent who will not pay you either weekly or at least fortnightly (and this is pushing the boat out). It’s madness, so don’t do it. You can never be 100% sure about the trading history or the integrity of an agency even from the statutory company searches available to you.

Quite often I have found that an agent who says he normally only pays monthly will be able to make “a special case for you” (and pay weekly) if you refuse to sign up to their slow payment terms.

5. Length of contract

The length of contract being offered is one of the key indicators of the quality of the final client and their attitude to you (the contractor). A six month contract normally indicates a sensible client with a sound grasp of all the steps involved in the software development life-cycle. A three month contract normally indicates a client who little understanding of software development, whose systems are more than likely in meltdown. If a potential client cannot commit to a 6 month contract for you to sort out their problems then they are probably not worth working for. The client can after all almost certainly terminate your contract with a weeks notice so it is not as if they are going out on a limb.

6. Notice period

Contracts can go bad for a number of reasons (utter boredom being one of them). If you have a one week notice period then it is quite straightforward to pull the plug and move on. Also beware of contract small print which might penalise you if you terminate the contract prior to the end date.

I once terminated a contract a month early (to get married as it happens) and the agent deducted his commission he would have earned for the last month from my final invoice.

I am not sure if this was legal but at the time I had more important things on my mind so I never pursued the agency in law.

7. Attitude to agents

Personally I have not set a good example in this area but not every agent/agency are totally useless (in 14 years of contracting I have maybe come across 1 or 2 good agents so it’s not all doom and gloom!) and it is probably better in the long run to humour them rather than treat them with distain. Their primary role (once you have nailed the job interview) is to ensure that you are paid promptly and possibly act as a buffer between you and the client if required.

8. Permies

Never show any surprise at the number of sickies, holidays, away-days, jollies, business lunches, personal phone calls, hours surfing, hours or even days spent in deep concentration doing expenses, unnecessary meetings, cigarette breaks (even if they don’t smoke) and so on that some permies indulge themselves with. Also never be too alarmed at the lack of productivity and professionalism of permies.

The inability of some permanent staff to deliver just an iota of productive effort is one of the main reasons why you have been employed by the company. As you can see for yourself the company has long since given up requiring their employees to get anything done.

9. Your Working day

In my experience of contracting I have found that for most days I have been able to deliver some distinct part or component of a system for each day worked. However there will be lulls where you may be waiting for more work or for some decision to be made.

You should not feel guilty during one of these lulls. In fact you should use it as an opportunity for doing your own research and personal development. It is up to your manager to make sure you have enough work to do. If he cannot provide a steady stream of work then that is not your problem (he or she was probably not expecting you to work so efficiently).

When I first started contracting I believed I had to account for every second of my working day with productive work to justify the ludicrous amounts I was being paid. Be content in the knowledge that your 2 hour bursts of concentration will be the equivalent of a whole weeks worth of effort from one permie.

10. Permie v contract

If anyone ask you if you would be interested in a permanent role, just say no unless of course are looking for early retirement. Better still if your contract is up for renewal then put your rate up.

10a. Cycle scheme

This is probably only for those who live reasonably close to their workplace.

Buy a bicycle and put the costs through your company and get your accountant to sort out the intricacies of claiming for it.

You will save untold amounts of money on rail fares, get to work on time and of course help save the planet.

p.s also get a pannier instead of that large heavy bag on your back and stop trying to look like a cool cycle courier!


This article has been viewed 12190 times.
Patrick Index

Author profile: Patrick Index

I have been contracting for 14 years and before that I worked for a software house for 5 years in the late 80's. I started out as a Lotus 1-2-3 developer and then did database development with Paradox. That soon became Access development which progressed to Access with SQL Server in a client server scenario and now I suppose I would describe myself as a SQL Server developer.

Search for other articles by Patrick Index

Rate this article:   Avg rating: from a total of 101 votes.


Poor

OK

Good

Great

Must read
 
Have Your Say
Do you have an opinion on this article? Then add your comment below:
You must be logged in to post to this forum

Click here to log in.


Subject: Show me the results of your "2 hour bursts of concentration"
Posted by: Proficient Permie (not signed in)
Posted on: Thursday, August 30, 2007 at 6:22 PM
Message: Show me the results of your "2 hour bursts of concentration" and I'll quietly do more in similar time, without bursts.

Subject: Who are paying you "ludicrous amounts"?
Posted by: John Rath (not signed in)
Posted on: Thursday, September 06, 2007 at 9:46 AM
Message: If you're being paid "ludicrous amounts" as you say, realize there are plenty of good and experienced database developers who have been out of work long enough to work for $25 an hour. So who are these companies and agents you worked for?

Subject: Agencies
Posted by: Brian T (not signed in)
Posted on: Thursday, September 06, 2007 at 2:10 PM
Message: Having been freelance since 1986 and having worked direct (no agent) for about 10 of those years I guess that leaves 11 years during which I had an agent. During that time I did have 2 bad agents although in the end I ignored the dodgy clauses in the contract and no harm came of it.

Obviously you only ever have one contract per bad agent if you have any sense. Equally obviously if you have a good agent you try and stick with them.

I had one very good agent (Jenrick-CPI, to give them a plug) and I was with them for several years and in several different countries. They were always upfront about the commission they took even inviting me to see their copy of the invoice to the client and telling the client they were happy for me to see the client's copy of the invoice.

If you have a succession of contracts through bad agents then you're doing something wrong.

Subject: Nice article
Posted by: JC (not signed in)
Posted on: Friday, September 07, 2007 at 2:19 AM
Message: I've been contracting for 10 years now and agree with the points you make. There are a bunch of wideboy agents our there (30% commission anyone?) who prey on the need of the contractor to get a job, often quickly.

Subject: Leave a contract early?
Posted by: HaggardPete (not signed in)
Posted on: Friday, September 07, 2007 at 3:22 AM
Message: Some good points here, especially about the rate. On the other hand billing weekly is just a pain and a source of errors.

But folks DONT run out on a contract whatever the terms allow. If 'Patrick' has done this a few times I am suprised he is still getting work.

Always honour your commitments even if they are just implied. Of course you dont have to accept a renewal. On the other hand if you do not intend to renew and suspect the client wants you for longer, make this clear at least a month in advance.


Subject: The Curmudgeon's 11th Tip for IT Contractors
Posted by: Anonymous (not signed in)
Posted on: Friday, September 07, 2007 at 12:45 PM
Message: I've been contracting for the past ten years and unemployed for the past eleven.

Subject: On - initial short term contracts
Posted by: Rick Sline (not signed in)
Posted on: Saturday, September 08, 2007 at 1:03 PM
Message: I've worked as a contract programmer most of the last 15 years - often thru agencies. It's surprising how many companies say they have a 3 to 6 week project then have a low-ball rate. My thinking at the time was - well I don't have anything scheduled for the next 3 weeks - so...

The last time I did this (3 week "easy" project), it took the client 3 months to nail down the data schema for the application I was to produce - forget having test data. The agency mis-represented the client location (20 miles from my house, not 5) and I had some problems getting pay issues resolved. The agency didn't return my phone calls with this and other problems. The agency claimed and probably is the largest IT staffing company in the US.

BTW, I'm happily employed and fully benefited at a major medical facility 3 miles from my home. In 10 years I can retire with permanent insurance at state rates and both pension & retirement benefits. The work is mostly 40 hours, and I get a lot of free meals! The people I work with are very pleasant and highly motivated MD's and PhD's. Life is good.

Subject: Horrible article
Posted by: Popa (not signed in)
Posted on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 at 1:29 AM
Message: Mate, you talk as if all permanent staff were suckers and all contractors some kind of marvellous solution to problems.
So keep putting everyone in the same bag, I've already put you in my bag of JERKS.

Subject: Interesting points
Posted by: Anonymous (not signed in)
Posted on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 at 3:10 AM
Message: I am a contractor/consultant being working with a good agency and working directly for clients of the last 6 years.
On every site I have been at there is always a sense of apathy from the employees at the sites.
Hence working as an employee for any of the sites I have contracted to would not have been a good experience.
But I must admit that the there are good companies out there to be employed at, so in the end it is purely preference as to which you should take
As for rates agree at the end of a contract always neg. a higher rate.

Subject: Just a chuckle
Posted by: Healthcare Programmer (not signed in)
Posted on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 at 3:51 AM
Message: I'm a 'permie' working in a group of 15 with 3 contactors...we all had a chuckle at your observations. There are certaily elements of truth, but perhaps some readers have taken you too seriously!

Subject: Disclosure of bill rate.
Posted by: Firewall1 (not signed in)
Posted on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 at 4:21 AM
Message: I live and work in the Metro Detroit area...and have not worked as an 'employee' since 2003. I've picked up projects here and there - and in my initial foray into consulting I've been burned on several occasions by 'contract companies' The last one didn't pay me until almost 3 months after I submitted my first bill! I didn't read the fine print, which read (paraphrasing) 'you will get paid *sometime* after the client pays us. The recruiter didn't state that, she said it would be on Net 45 terms...she gave me her 'word' and like most blood sucking recruiters/sales people - she lied. I believe a good many 'noob' contractors/consultants get burned - initially.
One other point - most contract companies do not disclose the actual bill rate, so asking for their percentage is moot.

Subject: Permanant
Posted by: Permie #2 (not signed in)
Posted on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 at 4:26 AM
Message: Seems like the permie problem is an American one. In my office its the contractors who are overpaid, slow, unintrested and take as much time off as they like...

Otherwise I agree with your other points when your ego does not get in the way.

Love
xx

Subject: Notice periods
Posted by: mwhelan (view profile)
Posted on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 at 5:47 AM
Message: I was interested in HaggardPete's comment about not walking out on a contract early. I've contracted most of my career and have also felt that I should honour the implied commitment. I've tended to overlook the notice period as I've found that contracts tend to extend to the natural conclusion of the project and it's just never been an issue.

I was recently taken on by a consultancy for a 3 month contract, not knowing that they only had a 6 week contract with their client. When their contract was not renewed they just issued me two week's notice. The frustrating thing is that I had several offers before going with this client and now I've found myself in a quieter market and without work for two weeks - quite a big cost. In the future I will give much greater consideration to the notice period terms.

I don't think that I can complain about what has happened as the consultancy has just done what they are entitled to do according to the terms of the contract. A contract works both ways though and now I tend to agree with Patrick - I should feel able to exercise the same clause myself if there is good reason.

Another painful lesson about agencies. Don't negotiate the rate before the offer from the client is confirmed. Whatever they might say they will push the candidate that gives them the biggest margin. Once the client has selected you you are in a far stronger negotiating position.

Great article Patrick. I don't know if it applies equally to other markets but it is bang on as far as the UK goes.

Subject: Permies
Posted by: Anonymous (not signed in)
Posted on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 at 6:32 AM
Message: In my opinion it's hats off to contractors for having the courage to go out and manage yourself & your workload and all the risks involved with it.

However there is just a bit too much permie-phobia in this article. In my experience (as both a contractor and a permie) there are a lot of professional, dedicated and hard-working permanent staff who are undervalued, overworked and underpaid, who are also expected to keep up with personal development in their own time rather than their employers bothering to invest anything to their knowledge. Sure, there are those who aren't like this, and also motivation can sometimes be limited for permies, but in my experience that is also true of contractors who are only interested in prolonging their contract because, as you say, when they are paying you ludicrous rates what incentive is there for getting the job done as quickly as possible?

Ask yourself this - why should a permie be too interested in helping contractors or being motivated when they see contractors coming in on rates that would more than cover the costs of them being sent on a training course so that they could do the job themselves? It's a bitter and provocatice subject in a lot of firms, and for a lot of people contracting really isn't an option for a variety of reasons. To denigrate these people through your generalisation is unfair on a lot of good workers.

While most of your article makes sense and is an interesting read your obviously deep-seated paranoia about permanent staff simply makes you look a bit of a twat.

Subject: Loved the article
Posted by: Boston Consultant (not signed in)
Posted on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 at 6:36 AM
Message: I must say you nailed things right on. Lot's of hack agents out there, but you have to be a salesman yourself and smooze them as much as they smooze you. I do have to disagree however with your estimate of working only 40 weeks. I've been contracting now for over 10 years and I've only had a total of 7 weeks off. two back on 9/11 and the other 5 through my own failure to start looking for next contract soon enough. I wish I could make myself take off that much time each year.

Subject: Notice periods
Posted by: mwhelan (view profile)
Posted on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 at 7:02 AM
Message: I was interested in HaggardPete's comment about not walking out on a contract early. I've contracted most of my career and have also felt that I should honour the implied commitment. I've tended to overlook the notice period as I've found that contracts tend to extend to the natural conclusion of the project and it's just never been an issue.

I was recently taken on by a consultancy for a 3 month contract, not knowing that they only had a 6 week contract with their client. When their contract was not renewed they just issued me two week's notice. The frustrating thing is that I had several offers before going with this client and now I've found myself in a quieter market and without work for two weeks - quite a big cost. In the future I will give much greater consideration to the notice period terms.

I don't think that I can complain about what has happened as the consultancy has just done what they are entitled to do according to the terms of the contract. A contract works both ways though and now I tend to agree with Patrick - I should feel able to exercise the same clause myself if there is good reason.

Another painful lesson about agencies. Don't negotiate the rate before the offer from the client is confirmed. Whatever they might say they will push the candidate that gives them the biggest margin. Once the client has selected you you are in a far stronger negotiating position.

Great article Patrick. I don't know if it applies equally to other markets but it is bang on as far as the UK goes.

Subject: Gee - a Divide?
Posted by: F1orid1an (not signed in)
Posted on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 at 8:23 AM
Message: Reading the comments is quite interesting. No doubt, the "Permies" take issue with many of your statements, Patrick.

As a contractor of 1

Subject: Gee - a Divide?
Posted by: F1orid1an (not signed in)
Posted on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 at 8:39 AM
Message: Reading the comments is quite interesting. No doubt, the "Permies" take issue with many of your statements, Patrick.

As a contractor of 15 years, I have found that most of your points are salient, within reason. Permanent employees are going to be less motivated to achieve the same goals in many cases, but not all cases. My experience has been similar - many are interested in putting in their 40 hours and going home. But, in recent contracts (over the last few years) I have encountered more and more that are more interested in delivering a good product, even if it requires more than 40 hours a week - which is very refreshing.

Agencies are a necessary evil and rates are more subject to negotiation as the candidate gains experience. Only in the last six years have I reached the point where my skills are in greater demand by many clients (simultaneously) in the same area. Contrary to the standard advice, I get two or three agencies to "shop me around" as this gives me the most leverage when it comes to negotiating a contract that appears desirable. However, one very important point - never, never, never use different agencies to talk to the same client - that is a certain means to being eliminated from consideration!

Finally - I always plan for 1950 hours a year. In the US, holidays (with the exception of Thanksgiving and Christmas/New Year) are steadily disregarded by most clients.

Subject: Are you kidding
Posted by: Anonymous (not signed in)
Posted on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 at 8:49 AM
Message: Permie's don't do much? That is a rather bold statement. I have seen contractors with backgrounds similar to yours come in as SQL Developers and leave a total mess in their wake...

I am currently a permie that has to clean up those messes. You impress as the type that takes a class, gets a certification and then you think you're some sort of expert.

A lot (not all, but a lot) of the contractors I have worked with were the epitome of lazy. The will not do a thing if it is not spelled out. They have no skin in any game because they leave at some point, so who cares if their work is good bad or indifferent. They are still happy to charge for their personal development.

By the way... I did contracting for years. The reason I stopped was because most of the other contractors I ran into were idiots.

Subject: what about personal initiative?
Posted by: Anonymous (not signed in)
Posted on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 at 9:09 AM
Message: I was appalled at your comment that "It is up to your manager to make sure you have enough work to do. If he cannot provide a steady stream of work then that is not your problem...".

Good grief! Why not take those opportunities to look for ways to be useful to the client - such as looking for and solving other problems they have?

If a client cannot regularly provide the challenge you need, then leave - it's not a good place for you. Clients know you're costing them even if you're idle; bringing an attitude that you're going to sit there until you're spoon-fed is juvenile and unprofessional.

Be a problem solver, not a problem child.

Subject: Spot On
Posted by: Zeek (view profile)
Posted on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 at 9:16 AM
Message: I have been consulting for over 15 years and find most of your observations spot on, with a couple of comments regarding rates. Rate negotiations with agents is an area where one’s negotiating skills will be put to the test and getting it wrong may have lasting consequences. A couple of items

1. Be prepared for this negotiation by doing some research and be prepared to strike a balance between what the market will allow and what you know you’re worth. Painful though it may be, your goal is be employed at a rate you’re comfortable with and that that may not always be what you’d like.
2. Initially, don’t confirm a rate with the agent. He’s already reduced the rate to inflate his margin. Instead leave it vague. You have no power to at this point to demand more and it would be much easier for him to simply move on to lower priced candidates than to deal with an exception for you - regardless of your brilliant skills.
3. After being told you’re the candidate of choice, you can now negotiate from a position of strength. If your agent doesn’t sign you now, he will have to go back to the client and explain how he managed to cock up the negotiation with their favourite candidate.

Subject: Wow, Take a buff...
Posted by: Anonymous (not signed in)
Posted on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 at 9:28 AM
Message: I've been in and out of contracting for longer than I want to admit. I prefer a long term permanent stint myself,but stability is something that is hard to find as a DBA, so I've contracted between permanent gigs - sometimes for a year or two. I've not encountered many of the problems mentioned here - with the exception of those who want to bill me at $120 and pay me $45 - I hate those, but I do them out of neccessity. This guy in the article seems to intimate that he, as a contractor has gigs constantly falling at his feet and can pick and choose... Me, I just take what I can reasonably handle for working conditions. Most of the 'Technical' questions I've faced have to do with very obscure or bizzarre situations, I typically just tell them that I'll look up the solution - thats what the web is there for. If you know everything and can answer it all, I probably enjoy working with you because chances are you are delusional and have control issues (an unfortunate common trait among many DBA's).
The fact that you want to avoid projects that are "in trouble" doesn't speak well of your self confidence - a good contract DBA can really help a project gone bad, dont you agree?

Subject: hmmm
Posted by: OA (not signed in)
Posted on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 at 10:59 AM
Message: I having been contracting for the past 12 years as a specialist in the SQL Server domain, the agent's stuff I agree with, your comments about permies I find are complete generalisations. I work as a contractor because it is challenging, I serve them with a notice and move on once it stops being challenging regardless of how much of my contract I have to go.

Subject: as CV's GO ...
Posted by: Anonymous (not signed in)
Posted on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 at 1:41 PM
Message: Makes interesting reading, but given your hiring manager is probably a permie in the midst of a burst of productivity your rate is probably at the beginning of a downward spiral. (Especially so if I just happen to be reviewing redgates productivty suite and this newsletter !)




Subject: Aren't you supposed to keep most of this stuff secret?
Posted by: Darren (view profile)
Posted on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 at 2:41 PM
Message: You missed out the point 12 .

Make sure you park you're porsche in the CEO's parking space!

As a contract of 8 years, I like what you've said and I agree with some of the follow up comments. It does go to show there is a border control between Permenant and contractors.

As for agents - I was an successful agent then the telecoms crash forced to get a job as a developer. I can vouch that they never earn their commission and even knowing what they are like I have been stung by cowboy agents refusing to pay last month invoices through notice period disagreements.

Would be nice to set up a agency reveiw board like they do with the building trade- I'll put one on my website if no one can point to one already created on a job site some where.

Subject: Trite biased truisms
Posted by: Dave (view profile)
Posted on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 at 8:14 PM
Message: Look Mum I can write my 10c in 10 easy bullet points.

Biased perception of permanent staff, work for a company that values its permanent staff and then express an informed opinion.

You missed a couple though for a newb contractor.

Never under any circumstances reduce the amount manual handling, it reduces billable hours.

It is only important to get a good reference from your employer, not your users, not operations, not your colleagues, only your Employer (and only one representative at that). Your Resume is safer than you think.

Begin every new employer relationship as if you have every idea of due process with your supervisor and none to you colleagues, it is amazing what unreasonable requests you can get away with.

Anything that will take some time to present itself is not worth worrying about. Its the next chumps problem.

Anything that is unattributable to being your fault but damaging to the company is irrelevant.

Knowledge sharing is a one way street, an empowered organisation is less likely to think they need your services.

Remember that best practice means the way you work.

Remember that Assessing technologies suitability concludes with finding a technology you are all ready skilled in. Or alternatively one you are interested in and can justify the training cost for.

And most important. It is only important to give your employer the perception you are skilled hard working and valuable. You don't actually need to be skilled, hard working or valuable.

Lets all string together more trite truisms and call it knowledge.

Subject: Notice periods
Posted by: mwhelan (view profile)
Posted on: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 at 10:24 PM
Message: I was interested in HaggardPete's comment about not walking out on a contract early. I've contracted most of my career and have also felt that I should honour the implied commitment. I've tended to overlook the notice period as I've found that contracts tend to extend to the natural conclusion of the project and it's just never been an issue.

I was recently taken on by a consultancy for a 3 month contract, not knowing that they only had a 6 week contract with their client. When their contract was not renewed they just issued me two week's notice. The frustrating thing is that I had several offers before going with this client and now I've found myself in a quieter market and without work for two weeks - quite a big cost. In the future I will give much greater consideration to the notice period terms.

I don't think that I can complain about what has happened as the consultancy has just done what they are entitled to do according to the terms of the contract. A contract works both ways though and now I tend to agree with Patrick - I should feel able to exercise the same clause myself if there is good reason.

Another painful lesson about agencies. Don't negotiate the rate before the offer from the client is confirmed. Whatever they might say they will push the candidate that gives them the biggest margin. Once the client has selected you you are in a far stronger negotiating position.

Great article Patrick. I don't know if it applies equally to other markets but it is bang on as far as the UK goes.

Subject: You're too serious...
Posted by: Anonymous (not signed in)
Posted on: Thursday, September 27, 2007 at 11:16 AM
Message: Apparently, many of the posters (Permies & Contractors alike) either took Patrick's
word too seriously or not being able to see the "truth". Of course, it's true that
there are some lazy & ignorance Permies do existed in some companies , while many
other Permies are truly hard workers in other companies. The same truth is also
applied for Contractors too. So, what does it meant? Don't take ALL of Patrick's
word as the ultimate truth for ALL cases, but apply the essence of it for each case.
I have seen it all - as an Permie & contractor myself - and there was truth in some case
but not true in other, and vice versa. If you're feeling upset because of the article,
then spend time to reflect on why it's so. More likely, it's yours problem than because
of what has been said in the article.

Subject: just my thoughts
Posted by: David (view profile)
Posted on: Friday, September 28, 2007 at 10:51 AM
Message: You said, "This is all obvious stuff but you may be new to contracting."

Anytime you have to say the word obvious then it is not so obvious. People who say that usually think they are smarter than they actually are. You seem to be a bitter, cocky a-hole who probably does not have the personaliity to become a perment employee. I don't even know you but if this is how you come across in the work place then I can see why you are a contractor(nobody can stand you after 6 months). I have worked with good and bad contractors, there is a place for them but never at my company.
Have a great day.



Subject: Agent?
Posted by: Anonymous (not signed in)
Posted on: Monday, October 01, 2007 at 9:58 AM
Message: Agent? What agent?
You left out the tip where you recommend being your own agent. I've been an IT consultant for merely 2 years now and have found all of my own work, negotiated my own bill rates, etc....
But then again...I'm an American and don't take the time off that you Europeans do. <Insert wink and smile here>

Subject: The Contractor as a Saint
Posted by: Mick (view profile)
Posted on: Thursday, October 04, 2007 at 8:36 AM
Message: I've worked with some absolutely fantastic contractors in the past, but then I've worked with an equal number of complete numpties - one sticks in the mind who took a week to write a report that was stretched to a whole side of A4 in a bullet pointed 12 point font, the content of which I could have rattled out in 10 minutes. He kept his contract for 9 months despite delivering nothing and adding no value to the team.

I think there is a presumption that as a contractor you are self-motivated and will just get on with things, and need to managing at all.

Personally, I feel contractors need the same level of support and performnance monitoring as permies, otherwise companies are potentially wasting their money by not getting the most out the the contractor.

As Forrest Gump would have said "Contractors are like a bag of Revels: you never know what you're going to get"

Subject: it contractor discussion
Posted by: snkscore (view profile)
Posted on: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 at 12:13 AM
Message: Does anyone know of a website or newsgroup where things of this nature (software contractor) are discussed?

I would love to read more from people in this community but I haven't found anything yet.

Subject: Father, Son, and Holy Contractor? "I don't think so, Tim."
Posted by: Lee (view profile)
Posted on: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 at 12:29 PM
Message: > "The inability of some permanent staff to deliver just an iota of productive effort is one of the main reasons why you have been employed by the company."

With all due respect, if anyone was entitled to put on a display of arrogance, it was Jesus, but He chose to be humble instead.

 


















Alan Kay: Geek of the Week
 The development of Object-oriented programming, the windowing User-interface, Ethernet and the Laptop... Read more...

Simon Sabin Says SQLBits
 SQLBits is the largest SQL Server conference in Europe. Because it is held on a Saturday, and is free,... Read more...

Level Playing Field
 The Federal Government in the States accepts tenders for their IT projects from a wide-range of... Read more...

Simon Peyton Jones: Geek of the Week
 Simon Peyton Jones is a Principal Researcher at Microsoft Research’s lab in Cambridge. Although he is... Read more...

Craig Newmark: Geek of the Week
 Occasionally, readers of Simple-Talk will ask quizzically if the 'Geek of the Week' that the editors... Read more...

Linus Torvalds, Geek of the Week
 Linus Torvalds is remarkable, not only for being the technical genius who wrote Linux, but for then... Read more...

Driving up software quality - the role of the tester
 Have you ever wondered what a software tester does? Helen Joyce, test engineer at Red Gate software... Read more...

Coming Out as a Cancer Survivor - A Guide for Software Developers
 A personal perspective on the responsibilities of a cancer-surviving software developer Read more...

The Computer that Swore
 Database Developers occasionally get crazy ideas into their heads. Phil Factor should know; He... Read more...

Bad CaRMa
 From hope and euphoria, to desperation, firings and the ultimate demise of a company. Tim Gorman charts... Read more...

Over 150,000 Microsoft professionals subscribe to the Simple-Talk technical journal. Join today, it's fast, simple, free and secure.

Join Simple Talk