Click here to monitor SSC

Phil Factor's Phrenetic Phoughts

Simple-Talk columnist
The wilder shores of Transact SQL    Phil on Twitter   Phil on SQL Server Central  Phil on BOS

Powerpoint Pointlessness: You read it here first!

Published Wednesday, March 28, 2007 12:04 PM

Professor John Sweller, from the University of New South Wales School of Education, first came up with 'Cognitive Load Theory' in the 1980s. Most of his reasearch has been in the effectiveness of current teaching techniques. He has now produced evidence that PowerPoint presentations are impossible to take in if the information on the screen is the same as that which is spoken, because the audience’s attention will be split between the two.
 
'The use of Powerpoint presentations has been a disaster. It should be ditched. It is effective to 'speak to' a diagram because it presents the information in a different form, but it is not effective to speak the same words that are written."
 
"If you ever wondered why your eyes start glazing over as you read those dot points on the screen, at the same time the words are being spoken, it is because it is difficult to process the information  if it is coming in the written and spoken form at the same time."
 
You read it here first, of course, in January 2006. Survival Tips For Powerpoint by Phil Factor
(modest cough)
 

 


 

Comments

 

Patrick Index said:

Whenever I go to a presentation (with Powepoint slides i.e. all the presentations I have attended in the last 10 years) I find myself gagging for the speaker to come out the slides and go into a practical demo (before I nod off).  Phil, you have hit the nail on the head again Powerpoint presentations are ...... pointless.
April 19, 2007 10:01 AM
 

jtklopcic said:

The best presentations I have seen have used the time-honored practice of hand-drawn flip charts.  Since the presenter has to prepare them one marker-stroke at a time, each one becomes a masterpiece of efficient communication.  No more microscopic print on a busy faux-modern background!
May 2, 2007 8:33 AM
 

Phil Factor said:

Thanks, Patrick and Jtklopcic. In reading over my article again I realise I forgot to mention that, when I was involved in the team determining corporate software standards for an International company, we made the competing potential suppliers sign a written undertaking never to give us any Powerpoint presentations, before they were allowed to be considered. It worked pretty well, though a few salesmen even then tried to 'make a break for it' until we retaliated with the fingers-in-the-ears-saying-LA-LA trick.

Were I to be suddenly called at short notice to replace the present government, I'd make a Powerpoint Presentation a Technical Assault. A sure vote-winner amongst right-minded people.
May 2, 2007 2:50 PM
You need to sign in to comment on this blog
Latest articles
A first look at SQL Server 2012 Availability Group Wait Statistics
 If you are trouble-shooting an AlwaysOn Availability Group topology, a study of the wait statistics... Read more...

SQL Server Prefetch and Query Performance
 Prefetching can make a surprising difference to SQL Server query execution times where there is a high... Read more...

SSIS Basics: Setting Up Your Initial Package
 When working with databases, the use of SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS) is a skill that often... Read more...

Checking Out SQL Backup Pro 7’s New Automatic Backup Verification
 Wouldn't it be great to offload the daily chore of checking the integrity of your production... Read more...

Chuck Lathrope: DBA of the Day
 Chuck Lathrope was a finalist for the Exceptional DBA of the Year award in 2009. We contacted him to... Read more...