Phil Factor's Phrenetic Phoughts

Simple-Talk columnist
The wilder shores of Transact SQL

The Septic Tank

Published Monday, August 28, 2006 7:14 PM

Once, whilst I was working for a large international enterprise, I received a company edict, from the IT director, that two megabytes of memory were sufficient to run Windows-based PCs. So firm was this edict that it was made it part of corporate IT strategy. PCs were not to be purchased with more than two megabytes of memory. It was some years ago, but even then it was absurd.

I phoned the manager of the department that was in charge of setting the standards for the configuration of PCs, to suggest to him that there may have been a clerical error in typing the edict. He was somewhat apologetic, but said the idea had come directly from the IT director who was extraordinarily keen on the idea and was already proudly calculating the money he would save the company. He had persisted against all advice but was determined on the policy, and so we all had to ‘go through the motions’ of implementing it. He added that as it was the first idea he had come up with since he had taken on the job, and it seemed wise to encourage and support him.

The edict caused me little more than inconvenience. All I had to do was to install some PCs in the purchasing department to the new regulated memory size. There was a furious response, and much laughter when I showed them the edict. They knew what was required. Memory was renamed ‘computer sundries’, or’ miscellaneous electronic equipment’ by these good people and supplies then flowed in as usual.

The incident did serve to suddenly awaken my interest on the man who had issued the edict. By all accounts, he lacked any qualities necessary for such a demanding role. His social skills were so poor that only the DEC salesman would willingly talk to him. He had to call his secretary over to access and read his email (it had to be printed out for him). He was helpless in any challenging practical or intellectual task. He apparently spent his days buying and selling his own shares on the stock exchange, with little success..

How, I wondered, had he progressed so well through the company to achieve his exalted status?.

I asked a manager who had known him for many years how on earth he had reached the exalted ranks of IT director. He shook his head sadly, and spoke coarse words that have stayed with me since, as they displayed an elemental truth.

‘Ah well, they say that the biggest turds always rise to the top of the septic tank’.

At the time I was taken aback by this old saying of army origin, which I apologise for repeating verbatim, but it ..er.. stuck in the mind, and he was, I think correct.. I then spoke to as many people as I could and a consistent story emerged. .

‘Oh yes, poor Tony. He was a bit of an oddball he was. I was persuaded to take him into my team by a colleague. I was told he was a good worker if he got the right opportunities. Was he hell. He sat around dreamily, and he had such repulsive personal habits that it used to upset the team. Nobody would work with him. It was getting on my nerves too. There seemed no good way to get rid of him so I got him promoted.’.

‘You did what?’.

‘Yup. You don’t imagine it is possible to sack a member of staff for incompetence do you? We’d have almost nobody left. What do you imagine the unions would say? The only way to get rid of a member of your team that you don’t want is to promote him. Onwards and Upwards, they say. I phoned a colleague, and told him he was a good worker if he got the right opportunities’.

‘Do you ever recommend people who are good at their job for promotion?’ .

‘Are you kidding, and lose them immediately? I need to retain good hard-working people in my team.’.

And so it went on. Everybody I spoke to gave me the same story. Tony made remorseless progress through the tiers of  IT management by the simple technique of picking his nose whilst staring at the screen, and grunting sporadically like a sow in heat.

Fortunately for Industry, it is not every manager within a large company, or government department, that has achieved his promotion this way. I’ve met many talented managers who have made enormous personal contributions to the well being of the enterprise for which they work. It is, however the minority who are promoted far beyond their talents that interests me the most, for their unintended contribution to the rich comedy of the workplace. How did they get there? Is there a whole range of group processes that cause unlikely people to be propelled way beyond their level of incompetence? Is there a particular talent that goes unrecognised by you or I, but which turns an ordinary person into a management X-man, with a sort of special management power only visible to another initiate?

Comments

 

Patrick Index said:

One of the most frustrating managers I ever had was a investment bank team leader who recruited me for a six month contract to do virtually nothing!  The job brief was Y2K compliance and euro conversions (which amounted to very little work once it was eventually analysed ).   There was  nothing for me to do apart from sit at my desk and maintain his departmental head count while collecting my daily rate.  Eventually after no work was forthcoming I got on with building an administration system for my cousin's private practice clinics.  I even informed the manager that this was what I was doing with my time (he was curious as to why I was tapping away at my keyboard as opposed to staring into space).  Despite the lack of work he was adamant that he wanted me to see out the full six months of the contract??  Anyway the extensive administration system that I built for my cousin during the contract is still being used today and has saved him large amounts of administration costs!

Paddy
August 30, 2006 6:14 AM
 

WBrewer said:

On the subject of IT dirctors who didn't understand IT...

I was once in charge of the Helpdesk for a large London site of a multinational company. I was sitting in my pigpen, minding my own business one day when I got an angry phonecall from the IT Director himself. He gave me a diatribe about the inefficiency of my department that seemed quite unwarranted. After listening to torrents of invective, I calmed him down enough to ask him what in particular had triggered his wrath.

At the time, we were using Wang PCs, which had a keyboard with a whole lot of extra function keys labelled with various email and wordprocessing functions. One of these extra keys had 'Help' written on it, which sent an F1 to the application.
It turns out that the IT director had been writing a document when some text he'd been working on disappeared (it had actually scrolled out of view). In a panic, he'd hit the 'Help' key, assuming that by some technological magic, it would ring a bell in the helpdesk to send us scurrying up to his office to provide assistance. Nobody turned up, despite him bangigng the key repeatedly and with some force.

This would, I suppose, have worked rather like the bell-pull used in Edwardian Country Houses to ring a bell in the servant's quarters to indicate the room where the servant was to go.

After working out what was going through his mind, I rushed up to his room to restore his lost text by scrolling it back into view, to his immense relief.
August 30, 2006 7:56 AM
 

Andrew Clarke said:

The edict.

The edict that two megabytes were sufficient for a windows PC came originally from Microsoft, I seem to remember. I've been trying to find chapter and verse from old documents, so far without success. I would doubt very much if your IT Director would have dared to make such a pronouncement without covering  himself with an official statement from Microsoft. He merely forgot that the answer '2 Megabytes' was to a different question. His question should have been 'How much memory does it require to run a couple of user-applications within MS Windows', rather than 'How much memory does it take to run MS Windows'.

August 31, 2006 7:19 AM
 

Gaina said:

I had an IT Director a long time ago who was actually an accountant. The board felt that, as he was pretty damned good at adding up, he must be able to understand IT. Whilst pretty good at budgeting, he was terrified of the PC and used to write everything out in longhand to be typed in by a secretary. Eventually, we managed to coax him into using a wordprocessor and Email. He remained pretty nervous. I'm told that, one day, the inevitable  happened and a message appeared on screen saying 'Fatal Error'. He gave a squeal of terror and left the room locking the door behind him, thinking the grim reaper was coming for him. From then on, it was back to Longhand.
August 31, 2006 12:10 PM
 

mosaic said:

"The biggest turds always rise to the top of the septic tank"
In our family we say:
"Falling upwards though lack of weight"
... but I like the septic tank version much better
October 26, 2006 8:08 AM
You need to sign in to comment on this blog

















<August 2006>
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
3456789
Creating Technical Presentations
 Making a technical presentation is like being interviewed. It is not a skill that you are likely to... Read more...

Go With the Flow
 Knowing enough about the routes that messages take is vital to being an effective Exchange admin,... Read more...

Policy-Based Management
 Every DBA knows the frustration of trying to manage tens of servers, each of which has a subtly... Read more...

When Email Collaboration Could Have Changed History
 In our mission to make history relevant to the busy IT executive, we speculate how Email might have... Read more...

Bunnikins!
 When an IT manager is selected as a victim of office politics of a large corporate, it is time for him... Read more...