Click here to monitor SSC

Charles Lee

SharePoint 2010 release date - is it that important?

Published Wednesday, March 10, 2010 10:00 AM

There has been lots of excitement in the SharePoint community over the last few days as Microsoft have announced the official release date of SharePoint 2010. May 12th is the date for your diaries (RTM in April.)

The twittersphere has been telling everyone for the last few days about this news and there is much excitement.

The major conferences this year all seem to have a SharePoint 2010 focus and some are entirely focussed on the new product (e.g. SharePoint Evolution Conference.) 

Now by all accounts Microsoft have plugged some significant functionality gaps that exist in WSS 3.0 and MOSS 2007 and provided some exciting new functionality.  You don't need me to tell you about these as the MVPs (and other community members) are doing a sterling job, after all that is why Microsoft has MVPs in the first place.

Lets get real for a second though as there is a significant investment involved in moving to SharePoint 2010: 

  • Firstly you need 64 bit architecture across the board, now for some environments that is no inconsequential hurdle, that's a pretty significant roadblock.  
  • The development farm, test farm and UAT farm are all going to require the same infrastructure upgrades.
  • To take advantage of the tooling for SP2010 you will need to upgrade to Visual Studio 2010 and your development team is going to require 64 bit hardware/OS too. 
    I would not recommend installing SP 2010 in client installation mode (i.e. for Windows 7) on your developer machines, I would use this for demo machines only.
  • Something that lots of people seem to forget in all their whooping and hollering about the new release is that there is a large amount of end user training going to be required as the browser UI has now adopted the omnipotent ribbon interface and there are other new and more complicated features.
  • SharePoint Designer has also entirely changed in both look and feel and some significant feature changes have taken place.
  • Lest we should forget that some companies have not long upgraded to MOSS 2007 and are yet to see a significant ROI for that project. And the reticence that most companies feel about implementing v1 Microsoft products. 

This is only the surface of the deeper issues which would be involved in any upgrade process, so I guess I share a small part of the concern voiced by Mark Miller of EndUserSharePoint.com

Is SharePoint 2010 relevant?

I don't share this sentiment in its entirety as I firmly believe that all companies should be looking at SharePoint 2010 from day one, however most large scale existing implementations of MOSS 2007 are going to be several years away from a serious upgrade project.  So should the conference organisers and the SharePoint community as a whole be a little more understanding of the real world issues?  It's easy to get carried away in the excitement of a new product and new tools to play with but there needs to be a focus on the real world issues that most people are facing day to day and at the moment and for the short term future (at the very least the next 12 months) that is fairly and squarely in the WSS 2.0/3.0 and SPS 2003/MOSS 2007 camps.

Don't get me wrong, I am very very excited about getting to grips with SharePoint 2010 in the real world and I cannot wait for my first real project to come along, but for now I am just being realistic about the reality for most people who work with SharePoint.

I have been spending a lot of time on www.sharepointoverflow.com recently as there is a community of people building up who are committed to answering the real world questions that folks are dealing with every day.  I urge you to take a look and either ask or answer some questions direct from the front line of the SharePoint world.

Comments

 

randyvol said:

While I agree with your point about keeping current on the state of any product, here we are just getting our feet wet on WSS3.0 !!  The price tag of MOSS (when you add up all the incidentals and the consultant's fees) is staggeringly cost-prohibitive for us at the moment.  But let's say we could justify it, what then, now we come to your 'short list' of 'gotchas' and I just have to ask myself what the Product Manager was thinking?

Must have 64-bit metal-n-sand across the board is a show-stopper for almost anyone.  Add the others in your list and I have to be honest; I cannot afford to waste the time looking at Sharepoint 2010 anymore than I could afford to waste the time looking at, say, a new Rolls Royce.  Yes, I'd like to have one; but since I know I cannot afford it, I have better things to do than go stare at one and what it offers.

Also, I am still chuckling as I write this response over the ending of your short list... "and there are other new and more complicated features." ??!!!!??!!?!!?!

Really, ***more*** complicated?  YOIKS !!!  It took use 153 steps to integrate WSS3.0 with SSRS 2K5 in a 'simple' configuration.  Then it took us plus a Sharepoint consultant, about 4 hours to figure out how to set all the bells and whistles in VS to be able to build and deploy a report so that it would install properly as a webpart and actually work.   When I consider what 2010 must be like to be more complicated, my mind reels ;-)

Having said all of this; we actually do like WSS - we just wish: a) it was less complex to use; b) less expensive to implement.
March 10, 2010 12:17 PM
 

CharlesLee said:

By 'complicated' I meant to the end users not from an IT perspective.

I am trying to be the Devil's Advocate here as there are a lot of posts out there about the benefits of SP2010 (which are numerous), but little focus has been given to the real world considerations.  There are many companies out there who will be prepared to deal with these issues sooner rather than later.

"Must have 64-bit metal-n-sand across the board is a show-stopper for almost anyone."

If this where true then Microsoft would have made a pretty big mistake.    ;-)
March 11, 2010 2:37 AM
 

sketchy00 said:

Some thoughts from the IT trenches...

The 64 bit architecture requirement would be an issue more (as it was with Exchange 2007 being only 64 bit) if IT departments weren't virtualizing their infrastructure.  This reason, for many, is how they are working around 64bit only deployments.  Its just as not as big of a deal as it used to be, and is a necessary step to advance the solution.

Sharepoint 2007 requires a ton of training when its a newer deployment, so from the company perspective, are you going to train on something that is a functional improvement, or train on something (equally, if not more complex) that is 3+ years old?  I'll hedge my bets on the newer edition.

The cautious approach of not leaping off the existing platform assumes there is compelling reason after compelling reason to stay with the existing version.  (e.g.  Sharepoint 2007 is functionally lacking, but rock solid, easy to deploy, easy to manage, etc.).  Does anyone actually believe that?  ...I've had many cases of solutions that it was indeed smart to hold off.  But I just don't see it here.

Setup, configuration, and management of Sharepoint on the IT side is one step shy of a nightmare.  It shouldn't be considered poor thinking that if a shop is rolling out sharepoint, that they should just take the leap with the newer software, figuring that the deployment process has to be better than the previous edition.  

The biggest thing MS could do is to streamline the transition process.  Step by step process for building up a new front-end and central admin server to replace (not just add to) the existing FE and CA server in your farm.  ...
March 11, 2010 9:49 AM
 

Floschx said:

Thanks for the real oposite blog entry in comparison to other blog entries about MOSS 2010.
I personally believe that MOSS 2010 offers some great improvements in the area of workflow integration. Additionally the web application sector (like visio integration in the web front end) also experienced some boost. Some features will have to prove in practice.
One main aspect that is out of focus in most blog entries about MOSS 2010 is the fact that MOSS 2007 is already very powerful compared to the former versions. A lot of companies just use a few of the possibilities offered by MOSS 2007. So the question is to my mind: Will everything change just because of a new product release of MOSS?
April 22, 2010 8:10 AM
 

Floschx said:

Thanks for the real oposite blog entry in comparison to other blog entries about MOSS 2010.
I personally believe that MOSS 2010 offers some great improvements in the area of workflow integration. Additionally the web application sector (like visio integration in the web front end) also experienced some boost. Some features will have to prove in practice.
One main aspect that is out of focus in most blog entries about MOSS 2010 is the fact that MOSS 2007 is already very powerful compared to the former versions. A lot of companies just use a few of the possibilities offered by MOSS 2007. So the question is to my mind: Will everything change just because of a new product release of MOSS?
April 22, 2010 8:12 AM
You need to sign in to comment on this blog

About CharlesLee

Charles Lee is a software solutions developer for a large law firm based in Birmingham in the UK. He has been developing with ASP.NET since 2003, and currently focuses on WSS 3.0 and MOSS 2007 solutions to complex business problems.
<March 2010>
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
28123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031123
45678910
How to Kill a Company in One Step or Save it in Three
 The majority of companies that suffer a major data loss subsequently go out of business. David Wesley... Read more...

Migrating from OCS 2007 R2 to Lync: Part 4
 Having migrated the rest of our users and legacy resources across, and start getting ready to... Read more...

Automated Script-generation with Powershell and SMO
 In the first of a series of articles on automating the process of building, modifying and copying SQL... Read more...

Seth Godin: Big in the IT Business
 Seth Godin has transformed our understanding of marketing in IT. He invented the concept of 'permission... Read more...

Using SQL Test Database Unit Testing with TeamCity Continuous Integration
 With database applications, the process of test and integration can be frustratingly slow because so... Read more...