Brad M McGehee

Focus on SQL Server
Check out my Simple-Talk articles.
Add to Technorati Favorites      Add to Google     

 RSS Feed

     Twitter      View Brad McGehee's profile on LinkedIn

SQL Server DBA Certifications: How Many People Have Which Certifications?

Published Friday, May 01, 2009 11:27 AM

According to Microsoft, as of April 2009:

 

  • 153,130 people have received the MCDBA: SQL Server 2000 certification

 

  • 51,445 people have received the MCTS: SQL Server 2005 certification
  • 854 people have received the MCTS: SQL Server 2008 Implementation and Maintenance Certification
  • 3,577 people have received the MCTS: SQL Server 2005 Business Intelligence certification
  • 333 people have received the MCTS: SQL Server 2008 Business Intelligence Development and Maintenance certification
  • 456 people have received the MCTS: SQL Server 2008 Database Development certification

 

  • 7,928 people have received the MCITP: SQL Server 2005 Database Administrator certification
  • 358 people have received the MCITP: SQL Server 2008 Database Administrator certification
  • 3,377 people have received the MCITP: SQL Server 2005 Database Developer certification
  • 213 people have received the MCITP: SQL Server 2008 Database Developer certification
  • 1,385 people have received the MCITP: SQL Server 2005 Business Intelligence Developer certification
  • 137 people have received the MCITP: SQL Server 2008 Business Intelligence Developer certification

 

  • 18 people have received the MCA: Database certification

 

  • 39 people have received the MCM: SQL Server 2005 certification
  • 2 people have received the MCM: SQL Server 2008 certification

 

From the numbers above, it appears that DBA certifications are becoming less popular among DBAs. What do you think?

For more information on Microsoft DBA certifications, visit here.

 

Share this post :

Comments

 

cfrandall said:

I don't think it's so much a matter of certifications being less popular, as it is the age of the certs. The SQL 2008 exams have only been out for 4+ months now, whereas the SQL 2000 certs are more than 10 years old.

I'd reckon the large number of SQL 2000 DBA certifications are in part due to the dotcom certification boom as well as the sheer amount of time people had to take the exams. Whereas only early adopters and people like MCTs who are required to certify ASAP have gotten to sit the 2008 exams so far.
May 1, 2009 5:02 PM
 

cfrandall said:

Correction to the above - the SQL 2000 certification is not more than 10 years old, rather the MCDBA certification, which began with SQL 7, is that old.
May 1, 2009 5:03 PM
 

ka5an said:

An other reason to avoid comparison between 2000 and 2005 is "one version jump". I'm one of these who skipped 2005 and directly take 2008 certificate.
Let remember that first preparation books was delivered from Amazon in middle of february 2009. Upgrade exams from SQL2005 was released in february too. Depending of these factors, the start results are definitely very good:
SQL2008 : 4 months = 358 + 213 + 137  = 708 MCITP ( 177 monthly)
SQL2005 : 48 months = 7928 + 3377 + 1385 = 12690 MCITP ( 264 monthly)

I expect less interest for Microsoft's certification programs from employers next years. My expectation is based on unbelievably easyer certification ways to PRO degrees. Decrese of certificate quality was bad idea for certified persons and for employers. Employers often can't understand and evaluate details between degrees with so much abbraviations. It's crazy to have separate diplomas for algebra, linear algebra, geometry and analytical geometry, isn't it? Only simple "DBA" is sufficient for the employer to expect serious knowleadge in database admistration and development. May be only MCM prerequests gravities around the real expectations for "professional" person, but it is impossible expensive for individuals (depending their living region) and are too high level for common case.
In fact there are no education paths nor certifications for "wide" specialists, who administers simple server and 2-3 databases, developes simple C# applications, supports 50-100 users in company with data integration and reporting - native activities in mid and small business, where 24x7 is not need, where don't have megastructures with clusters and databases are often less gigabyte.
First exam with first degree to associate - ok, but it is stupid to present professional who don't know BI basics and can't write simple script.
I'm sorry, I'll beginner in english all my live. :)
May 26, 2009 6:04 PM
 

ionFreeman said:

Brad,

Do you know if there's an updated listing of the certification counts? Your link is dead. The Masters and Architects are listed at  http://www.microsoft.com/learning/en/us/certification/master.aspx#SQL, but I don't see a count of the MCITPs anymore.

Ion
February 8, 2010 4:55 PM
You need to sign in to comment on this blog

About bradmcgehee

Brad M. McGehee is a MCSE+I, MCSD, and MCT (former) with a Bachelors’ degree in Economics and a Masters in Business Administration. Currently the Director of DBA Education for Red Gate Software, Brad is an accomplished Microsoft SQL Server MVP with over 13 years’ SQL Server experience, and over 6 years’ training experience. Brad is a frequent speaker at SQL PASS, European PASS, SQL Connections, SQLTeach, SQLBits, SQL Saturdays, TechFests, Code Camps, SQL Server user groups, and other industry seminars, where he shares his 13 years’ cumulative knowledge. Brad was the founder of the popular community site SQL-Server-Performance.Com, and operated it from 2000 through 2006, where he wrote over one million words on SQL Server topics. In 2008, Brad attended 16 conferences/user group events, presented 26 sessions, and had 1,402 people attend them. A well-respected and trusted name in SQL Server literature, Brad is the author or co-author of more than 14 technical books and over 100 published articles. His most recent books include “How to Become an Exceptional DBA,” and “Brad's Sure Guide to SQL Server 2008: The Top Ten New Features for DBAs,” and “Mastering SQL Server Profiler.”


















<May 2009>
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
262728293012
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31123456
Raw Materials: Command-Line Nostalgia
 Arthur finds philosophy deep in a dialog box. Read more...

Increasing Email Size Limits for your High Profile Users in Exchange 2010
 If you ever need to set up fine-grained rules to control the maximum size of messages a subset of your... Read more...

Product Review: Schema Compare for Oracle
 One of the more important tasks in the process of rolling out incremental developments to a... Read more...

Implementing the OUTPUT Clause in SQL Server 2008
 In retrospect, it was probably the inclusion of the OUTPUT clause in the MERGE statement that gave... Read more...

SQL Source Control: The Development Story
 Often, there is a huge difference between software being easy to use, and easy to develop. When your... Read more...